Add an image
Add a link
December 16, 2009 -- 10:03 PM
posted by Par
For future reference, if you mouseover the quote on the top right there you'll get the quotee, but this one's from the 1984 hit film The Muppets Take Manhattan. Kermit is trying to sell their show by pretending to be a well-connected agent visiting a broadway producer named Leonard Winesop (played by John Landis). Also, I think he's cross-dressing, but it's hard to say.
(The line before Kermit busts into the guy's office is him on the phone asking "What? A frog with an afro?" Classic.)
December 16, 2009 -- 12:51 AM
posted by Beck
Dunno why it's taken so long for me to hear the first Tiger Woods joke... but here it is.
It is near the Christmas break of the school year. The students have turned in all their work and there is really nothing more to do. All the children are restless and the teacher decides to have an early dismissal..
Teacher: "Whoever answers the questions I ask, first and correctly can leave early today."
Little Johnny says to himself "Good, I want to get outta here. I'm smart and will answer the question."
Teacher: "Who said 'Four Score and Seven Years Ago'?"
Before Johnny can open his mouth, Susie says, "Abraham Lincoln."
Teacher: "That's right Susie, you can go home."
Johnny is mad that Susie answered the question first.
Teacher: "Who said 'I Have a Dream'?"
Before Johnny can open his mouth, Mary says, "Martin Luther King."
Teacher: "That's right Mary, you can go."
Johnny is even madder than before.
Teacher: "Who said 'Ask not, what your country can do for you'?"
Before Johnny can open his mouth, Nancy says, "John F. Kennedy."
Teacher: "That's right Nancy, you may also leave."
Johnny is boiling mad that he has not been able to answer to any of the questions.
When the teacher turns her back Johnny says, "I wish these bitches would keep their mouths shut!"
The teacher turns around: "NOW WHO SAID THAT?"
Johnny: "TIGER WOODS. CAN I GO NOW?"
Also, what's the "Boffo, Lenny! Socko, Lenny!" reference? A google search isn't helping, although if you do an image search you'll find that we're numbers 1-5 on there, and that two of those images are from an interesting cache...
December 15, 2009 -- 12:02 PM
posted by Al
Only one obvious reason for me to see Avatar:
Giant robots of destruction!
December 15, 2009 -- 11:05 AM
posted by edo
I wouldn't say Industry Canada really interfered or changed anything... but either way, the competition will be good. With two more companies starting next year (Dave Wireless & Public Mobile) and more in the future (Shaw and Videotron also bought airwaves), it will be a good time to not be tied to a contract. Even if you are, odds are Telus/Bell/Rogers (and their minion companies) will be offering deals to stay with them.
December 15, 2009 -- 1:10 AM
posted by Par
So, I was directed to a review of Avatar by Roger Ebert, where he seemed rather impressed by the movie. Not knowing anything of the plot (or anything at all about the movie save the hype about 3-D and James Cameron's self-aggrandizing) I thought "hmm, why not watch the trailer."
And then I remembered why I hate watching trailers. You can watch for yourself if you like but be warned (as I was not) that most of the plot (save the possibility of a twist before the climax) is revealed in those three minutes of the video.
Gone from piqued curiousity to no interest at all in seeing the movie in a matter of a few minutes.
December 15, 2009 -- 1:05 AM
posted by Par
I agree, Jesse. Competition = good. Political interference in regulatory action for the sake of "increasing competition" = bad. If the ownership rules are a problem, change the ownership rules. (You have a plurality in the House. Get it done.) If the rules aren't a problem, don't interfere.
(Not that I'm terribly optimistic about the new service. Virgin was supposed to improve everything, too, but now it's just all Bell.)
December 14, 2009 -- 9:42 PM
posted by edo
Hold the phone...
Octopus snatches coconut and runs!
Specifically, Octopuses are acquiring halved coconut shells and using them for shelter. That means we need to add these to the list of animals that use tools, and will one day turn on humans. I'm fairly certain the video in the link ends with the Octopus’s unwarranted killing of the camera man.
December 12, 2009 -- 11:55 AM
posted by Jsese
I'm not sure how to think about the Globalive/ Wind addition to canadian telecoms. I think the big three have been taking advantage of the system for a while now and that some new competition is a good thing. Of course the big 3 are not happy about someone else undercutting them. But I think the CRTC was correct in keeping Globalive out based on them not being a Canadian company. Changing our laws based on our governments whims, basically the idea of more tax dollars from another large company got Mr. Harper all excited in his nether regions, is not the best way to run our country. So, is this a good thing? or a bad thing? I dunno, Both?
also, yay canada
"Canada fiercely opposes proposal to extend Kyoto ". We wouldn't want to stand by our word now would we. that might cost us something. Why is Mr. Harper dragging Canada's good name through the mud?
December 11, 2009 -- 9:47 AM
posted by edo
In case you've heard me rant/talk about it:
Globalive allowed to enter Canadian cellphone market
The big 3 are not happy:
"If Wind is Canadian, then so was King Tut," said Michael Hennessy, head of regulatory affairs for Telus, on his Twitter page. "When you have no effective opposition party, you can make the rules you want."
