> Life is like biryani. You move the good stuff towards you & you push the weird shit to the side.  

post a new message


lorem ipsum

May 11, 2025 -- 11:20 PM
posted by ( )

Add an image    

Add a link


go back to maingo to old version

June 16, 2011 -- 6:37 AM
posted by Al

And Canuck fans wonder why no one likes them?

June 15, 2011 -- 9:22 PM
posted by Par

Canucks fans party like it's 1994. Fucking embarrassing.

June 14, 2011 -- 11:28 PM
posted by Beck

The Doctor at the royal wedding = pure awesome.
I'm sure that has to be photoshopped, but still pretty cool.

In other news: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2003393/How-Citigroup-hackers-broke-door-using-banks-website.html

This article calls them "hackers", and quotes a "security expert" calling it a "browser vulnerability" that would have been "hard to prepare for". The vulnerability in question? Logging into the website and changing the account number in the URL. Damn those browsers and their security flaws, now citigroup looks stupid because of the insecure ability to change the URL on the client side...

I'm know I don't know everything there is to know about security, but damn, that's about the most insanely stupid thing I've ever seen - for a banking site even.

And I'd love to know who that "security expert" is that considered this "hard to prepare for".

June 14, 2011 -- 10:54 PM
posted by Par






Yeah, I did see that, and found it unfortunate that he wasn't willing to put in the effort, considering the weight of the occasion. Dr. Baker's tenure started after my graduation, so I can't comment on his other work with the faculty, but this is rather a disheartening incident.

That said, I don't know what sort of sanction the University or the faculty can hand down. As far as I'm concerned, it's the Class of 2011 that he owes apology to, and it's on their behalf that action ought to be taken. They deserve to be proud of their accomplishment and his shortcutting and the subsequent headlines shine the spotlight away from that. How he repays that, though, I don't know.

June 13, 2011 -- 3:34 PM
posted by alison

Hey Par, have you and Nadeesha seen this?

As former med students, how do you think the faculty should react to the Dean of medicine plagiarizing a graduation speech?

How do you come off as a legitimate institution without some form of clear reprimand, since students are expected to obey the plagiarism rules? ... not that anyone gets reported. We attempted to flunk a student in the class I TAed and the dean wouldn't stand by it, despite glaringly obvious evidence.

June 12, 2011 -- 8:52 PM
posted by alison

Technology for 2000, as imagined in 1910:

via Copyranter.

June 10, 2011 -- 11:27 PM
posted by alison

Now THIS is how you own a DeLorean
.

June 10, 2011 -- 6:36 PM
posted by alison

Congratulations Paras! I like the phrase "terminal assessment of knowledge and skills" ... although, I sincerely hope that doctoring isn't going to kill you.


And Beck, the person circled, speaking of doctors, is Matt Smith, dressed in the tweed suit and bow tie (because bow ties are cool) of the current incarnation of The Doctor. I still can't believe it took me so long to cotton on to this reincarnation of the series. I always though K-9 was lame, and as a result didn't watch it while growing up, but this new series is pretty awesome. ... particularly the current cliffhanger. (Thanks Albert for the Christmastime exposure to the newest Doctor!)

Oh, and Albert, I agree, he IS quirky etc. in real life, to the same extent as the Doctor, but in a different way... a colourful socks and mickey mouse t-shirt kind of way, apparently... not so much bow ties.

June 10, 2011 -- 6:40 AM
posted by Al

Congratualtions Par!

June 09, 2011 -- 9:05 PM
posted by Dr. Riviera

So easy to be ranty.... sigh.

An interesting (but comprehensive) view is given in the stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. And yes, I do need a new hobby. I encourage any interested parties to refer to the original article, which is quite well written.

"many theorists have argued that our current diagnostic categories, as compiled into DSM-IV-T-R (American Psychiatric Association 2000), are faulty because they are derived from observable variables rather than underlying physical pathologies. These theorists are sceptical about many existing psychiatric diagnoses, and not just on empirical grounds; they see DSM diagnoses as collections of symptoms rather seeing them as medicine understands diseases—in terms of destructive processes realized in bodily tissues. Genuine mental illnesses, on this view, are not just sets of co-occurring symptoms but destructive processes taking place in biological systems......But we often know very little about the mental illnesses that psychiatrists study, and much explanation in psychiatry involves case studies or narrative accounts that cite the characteristics of a disorder, rather than underlying systems."

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/psychiatry/

Which is to say that I agree with Par that mental illnesses are better described as syndromes (which don't presuppose a known underlying cause) than as diseases. While certain symptoms cluster together, we can't necessarily say why they do, or by what mechanism they occur. The backwards extrapolation from an effective treatment (ie. an antidepressant) to assuming the basic pathophysiology of a disease is troublesome and prone to logical error.

My last word on this subject.

And, many congratulations Dr. P. Welcome to the world of gainful employment.

load more posts . . .