Add an image
Add a link
August 12, 2010 -- 11:36 PM
posted by JsESe
Thanks for responding. I thought maybe I was missing something obvious, but it seems you know similar things to what I do.
-Why does it seem to me like this guy needs some compassion instead of a kick in the junk as it seems he is getting. Honestly, if someone started shooting at my house and I had a way of defending myself, I'd do my best to stop them from, you know, killing me.
-Why does it matter that he was Canadian? I know its nice to think we take care of our own, but I don't know this guy, never met him, most likely never will. So he happens to have Canadian citizenship.... so what? Shouldn't our compassion or at least, rules about child soldiers and the like extend to everyone?
-Why was he special enough to be taken to Guantanamo? Are 15 yr old kids the mastermind behind Al Qaeda's most inner workings? or was he just an easy mark to get info out of? Just a kid, He'll crack easily perhaps? Was it because he was from a well to do Canadian family that they couldn't just leave him in an afghani prison? Maybe he is really 007...
-I'm not necessarily expecting answers here. perhaps some illumination. discussion maybe.
on another note, if someone attacked Israel on the Sabbath would they be allowed to fight back? or would that be considered work?
August 12, 2010 -- 6:44 PM
posted by alison
The humanitarian argument is that Omar Khadr also happened to be 15 at the time. And there are supposed to be all kinds of rules about dealing with child soldiers who are often forced into their roles in the war by fear or threats of violence against their family etc. Not to mention coercion and brainwashing with propaganda etc. that I'm not sure even those of us in our early 20's are immune to. Here's a good article on children as soldiers by UNICEF; it's from 1996, but has a decent synopsis of the main concept.
What makes Khadr different in the non-child-warrior sense is that unlike the rest of the Afghan fighters (civilian and army/militia/mercenary/whatever), he was taken prisoner. Not only was he taken prisoner, but he was put in Guantanamo Bay, which has its own pile of amazingly convoluted and awful associations, not to mention the fact that they've contravened the Geneva convention numerous times and have decided to submit Khadr's confessions that were made under duress and torture.
uh, also don't forget that he's also a Canadian citizen.
August 12, 2010 -- 5:07 PM
posted by Al
Well from a military point of view he ain't a professional soldier. So he would be tried as a non-combatant, mercenary or a terrorist I think, not to up on my military law.
Plus terrorist (and mercenaries) are not afforded the rights professional soldiers are under the Geneva convention. Bend the rules alot and you can get away with almost anything.
August 12, 2010 -- 3:36 PM
posted by Jess
Terrorism is supposed to be politically motivated violence against civilians; by that definition, Khadr should not be tried as a terrorist, as he threw a grenade at a soldier in a country at war. He is being tried as a terrorist because that soldier was part of an occupying force supposedly "fighting terrorism." To oppose the war on terror, by George Bush's logic (2001 statement: "if you're not with us, you're against us"), must mean support for terrorism, right?
Google RAWA for examples of how you can oppose both the Taliban and the US-led war in Afganistan. Also interesting is the Wikipedia page on "You're either with us, or against us." I particularly like the condemnation of this logic in Disney's Beauty and the Beast, of all places.
August 12, 2010 -- 2:44 PM
posted by jsese
quick question, (Kinda)
How is Omar Khadr any different from any of the other soldiers that have thrown a grenade (allegedly) during a war? Is he special somehow? or are now trying anyone who has ever killed someone during a war? Or just the people not on our side? Does not being on our side automatically make someone a terrorist?
sorta got away from me there. sorry. just trying to figure some things out. Any insight would be appreciated.
August 10, 2010 -- 9:01 PM
posted by alison
August 08, 2010 -- 9:03 AM
posted by edo
Oh yeah, and in case you didn't see the new Quidditch jerseys in Calgary.
August 08, 2010 -- 8:57 AM
posted by edo
Nabokov: "Let me ask you, would you want to play for the Edmonton Oilers, for example?" [laughter]
Nabokov talks about coming home to KHL, why league isn't 'step back'
