lorem ipsum
Add an image
Add a link
go back to maingo to old version
load more posts . . .
February 21, 2004 -- 6:23 PM
posted by nobody knows my face
Eric's type descriptions:
- Type description for INFP
Apparently, your 'Pal' will be an ENFP... which is me. hahaha
Oh wait... and conversely, my 'Pal' would be an INFP. Guess that would make sense.
February 21, 2004 -- 6:18 PM
posted by nobody knows my face
now everybody knows all about the face
- Apparently I'm an ENFP (aka: Champion Idealists or Advocates)... and it's disturbingly deadly-accurate in its description of me:
ENFPs have a great deal of zany charm, which can ingratiate them to the more stodgy types in spite of their unconventionality.
They come up with great ideas, and are a major asset in brainstorming sessions. Followthrough tends to be a problem, however; they tend to get bored quickly, especially if a newer, more interesting project comes along. They also tend to be procrastinators, both about meeting hard deadlines and about performing any small, uninteresting tasks that they've been assigned. ENFPs are at their most useful when working in a group with a J or two to take up the slack.
ENFPs hate bureaucracy, both in principle and in practice; they will always make a point of launching one of their crusades against some aspect of it.
ENFPs have what some call a "silly switch." They can be intellectual, serious, all business for a while, but whenever they get the chance, they flip that switch and become CAPTAIN WILDCHILD. Sometimes they may even appear intoxicated when the "switch" is flipped.
ENFPs like to tell funny stories, especially about their friends. This penchant may be why many are attracted to journalism.
Eric, here apparently is the difference between you and I:
While the shy, seclusive Monastics (Myers's "INFPs") devote themselves largely to cultivating inner purity, the high-spirited Advocates (Myers's "ENFPs") turn their energies outward to investigate the public world and to develop their social awareness. Keirsey calls the Advocates "keen and penetrating observers," who "can't bear to miss out on what is going on around them." And he has referred to them both as "Apocalyptics" and "Heralds". Brimming with life, Advocates live more spontaneously "in-the-flesh" than Monastics, and at first glance they can be rather easily mistaken for Artisans. Although Advocates are thus more public-minded than the Monastics, and more confident in dealing with people, they are only slightly more directive in their private interactions.
February 21, 2004 -- 6:09 PM
posted by P
You were supposed to check out those links that come along with the results. Your "type description by" whozits and someone else.
February 21, 2004 -- 5:37 PM
posted by eric
- uh...what exactly am i suppose to get from these numbers, and was Jung really involved with this test? doesn't seem to be his kind of thing...
Your Type is
INFP
Introverted-11 Intuitive-67 Feeling-22 Perceiving-33
Strength of the preferences %
Qualitative analysis of your type formula
You are:
slightly expressed introvert
distinctively expressed intuitive personality
slightly expressed feeling personality
moderately expressed perceiving personality
February 21, 2004 -- 5:34 PM
posted by alison
- I think it's a trend of mine to post singly or in threes
so why not continue that?
anyway, I think there are some things missing in this picture, what do you think?

<http, Alison. http>
oh for pete's sake
if you're really that interested, check out this:
Library Cats Map but it gives away what's missing
February 21, 2004 -- 5:09 PM
posted by alison
- one more thing.
I developed a roll of film (ooo)
and it had photos from Beck and Keri's surprise wedding party
as well as the formal wedding reception.
If you would like to see them, let me know,
I'll try to bring them to campus
February 21, 2004 -- 5:07 PM
posted by alison
- so... tonight, Fargo's... do any benders need rides?
I have a car, and I won't drink.
lovely personality test, P.
i'm an idealist teacher... who'dve thunk it?
and only 2-3% of the world's population is
(does this make me somewhat freakish by default?) ;)
i'm in with Oprah and Ralph Nader... not bad company
sure, personality pigeon-holing is sort-of an odd practice.
and numerous times, I wanted to put my answer in the "not necessarily" box
but there wasn't one. they need a "none of the above" or "maybe" option
because I'm just so damn indecisive.
anyway, i'm really just a sucker for those tests...
anything to distract me from the research i'm supposed to be doing.
load more posts . . .





